From: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org (faxlist-digest) To: faxlist-digest@monkey.org Subject: faxlist-digest V2003 #13 Reply-To: faxlist@2350.org Sender: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org Errors-To: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org Precedence: bulk faxlist-digest Thursday, January 16 2003 Volume 2003 : Number 013 Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) oh, give it up Paul Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) oh, give it up Paul RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) oh, give it up Paul RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) (I hope this thread dies soon) getting more OT (was Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) (I hope this thread dies soon)) Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) (I hope this thread dies soon) (fax) Orientation (fax) Non-Fax artists being discussed here (and why not?) Re: (fax) Non-Fax artists being discussed here (and why not?) (fax) Outlands RE: (fax) Outlands (fax) the dark stuff RE: (fax) the dark stuff (fax) 62 e (fax) RE: 62 e Re: (fax) 62 e RE: (fax) 62 e Re: (fax) FAX COVER ART (formerly:RE: 62 e) (fax) Re: 62 e RE: (fax) the dark stuff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:28:59 +0000 From: Paul Milligan Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) oh, give it up Paul > you can't tame JTT. Quite possibly but I can't resist a challenge. > your references to Roach are a disservice to Fax. The references have never strayed beyond his excellent collaboration with Vir Unis. > unless you are aka Rich or Roach himself, which would >explain how that crap gets around. Nope, I am based in the UK (Liverpool) > do you have alternate email subscritions to this list > to support your view? Which view specifically please? ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:41:03 -0500 (EST) From: Warren Lapham Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) oh, give it up Paul On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, ambient wrote: > you can't tame JTT. no, but perhaps he ought to try to tame himself. or, at least, listmembers should not fall for his attack/backpedal ploys as often. it's actually a bit tiresome: "I wasn't attacking you personally," he said to Paul, not long after he'd shamed, insulted, spanked, and shot him. yeah...right. debate is fine (encouraged, even), but can we please keep it above the schoolyard level, please? thanks. - -w. - -- http://www.warlap.net/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:43:58 -0600 From: "Mark B. Conklin" Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) > you can't tame JTT. I'll speak up and state that I am growing increasingly tired of JTT's numerous, but insubstantial, posts. MC ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:53:01 -0500 From: "Conlon, Timothy J" Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) and may the Lord have mercy on your soul > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark B. Conklin [SMTP:mconklin@insightbb.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:44 PM > To: faxlist@2350.org > Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) >=20 > > you can't tame JTT. >=20 > I'll speak up and state that I am growing increasingly tired of JTT's > numerous, but insubstantial, posts. >=20 > MC >=20 >=20 > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: = > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:53:00 -0500 From: "jackthetab" Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) oh, give it up Paul I would like to spank Paul....but he is not interested. kunst und wahnsinn, jackthetab #####\ _ /##### #( )# | _( )__ | #( )# ##### | /_woof/ | ##### #" "# | ___m/I_ /_____ | #" "# # O # |____#-x.\ /++m\ /.x-#____| # O # #m.m# | /" \ ///###\\\ / "\ | #m.m# #####/ ######/ \###### \##### /_______________________________________\ - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren Lapham" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:41 PM Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) oh, give it up Paul > > "I wasn't attacking you personally," he said to Paul, not long after he'd shamed, insulted, spanked, and shot him. > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:53:04 -0500 (EST) From: "Stephen Philips" Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) Or maybe it's just JTT doesn't like Steve Roach and maybe he subscribed to the FAX list so he could discuss FAX stuff and not Roach stuff and maybe he finds it strange that Steve Roach is being discussed on the FAX list and AFAIK he has no CDs on Fax. Neither does Vir Unis or Robert Rich for that matter. Maybe JTT is just sick and tired of hearing about Steve Roach, or maybe I'm totally wrong. Stephen Philips Dark Duck Records e | music@darkduck.net web | http://www.darkduck.net Drone Download Project: http://www.darkduck.net/drone.htm ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:36:18 -0500 (EST) From: Warren Lapham Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Stephen Philips wrote: > > Or maybe it's just JTT doesn't like Steve Roach and maybe he subscribed to > the FAX list so he could discuss FAX stuff and not Roach stuff Then maybe he shouldn't bring him up, eh? Please recall that that particular thread started ("The Dark Side of the Moog IX - PK 08/163 and Pauls review") when JTT critiqued a review from 2350.org that referred to the artists in question. Or, alternately, you _could_ say that any review posted at 2350.org is fair game to discuss on the list, so if that review compares a title to the work of artists not related to the label (which is a common and perfectly acceptable way to create a frame of reference), then it's OK to bring up those artists on the list. Either way, though, it was JTT who initiated that particular thread that spiralled out of control. (Yes, I know there had been discussion of said artists before.) Stephen, if you have (or anyone else has) a problem with threads that you percieve as off-topic, please mail me in private. I don't think anyone will argue with me when I observe that JTT himself could probably voice his own concerns, if he has any. - -w. - -- http://www.warlap.net/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:07:45 +0100 From: "msg_matucana" Subject: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) Hi Jack, > I would like to spank Paul....but he is not interested. everybody feet up... for the level is so low now... > kunst und wahnsinn, BTW: why "art and madness"? CU, Hellmuth ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:33:21 -0500 (EST) From: "Stephen Philips" Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) Warren Lapham wrote: > Stephen, if you have (or anyone else has) a problem with threads that > you percieve as off-topic, please mail me in private. I don't think > anyone will argue with me when I observe that JTT himself could probably > voice his own concerns, if he has any. I don't perceive anything, I just keep to myself, read, and lurk ;-) I think there's so little FAX stuff coming out these days that a little off topic post every now and then is no big deal, or an extremely big deal, depending on your own perception. On that note, I think the general JTT-bashing is about as irritating as JTT bashing Roach so there. Either way I don't really care it's just that I was starting to confuse the FAX list with the ambient mailing list there for a second :-) Stephen Philips Dark Duck Records e | music@darkduck.net web | http://www.darkduck.net Drone Download Project: http://www.darkduck.net/drone.htm ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:12:13 -0800 (PST) From: ambient Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) it was jtt who started it. and i REALLY REALLY wish he didn`t. > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Stephen Philips wrote: > Or maybe it's just JTT doesn't like Steve Roach and maybe he - --- Warren Lapham wrote: > Then maybe he shouldn't bring him up, eh? Please recall that that > particular > thread started ("The Dark Side of the Moog IX - PK 08/163 and > Pauls review") > when JTT critiqued a review from 2350.org that referred to the > artists in > question. > Either way, though, it was JTT who initiated that particular > thread that > spiralled out of control. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:38:18 -0700 From: subLight Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) (I hope this thread dies soon) I could be completely wrong in my guess - but these look like IDM references... Kunst und Wahnsinn (Pankow), Jack the Tab (Psychic TV) Jack? At 11:07 PM 1/15/2003 +0100, you wrote: >Hi Jack, > > > I would like to spank Paul....but he is not interested. > >everybody feet up... for the level is so low now... > > > kunst und wahnsinn, > >BTW: why "art and madness"? > >CU, Hellmuth > >--- >+ To post: ; to mail a person: >+ To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to >+ Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:29:25 -0500 From: micah stupak Subject: getting more OT (was Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) (I hope this thread dies soon)) At 09:38 PM 1/15/2003, you wrote: >I could be completely wrong in my guess - but these look like IDM >references... Kunst und Wahnsinn (Pankow), Jack the Tab (Psychic TV) whoa, pankow is idm now! damn. i guess that's what doing a industrial-rock-type cover of prince will get ya. though it does go to show that label ("idm") sucks. ;) ________________ micah@benthic.cc www.benthic.cc benthic recordings - soundings from unexplored places ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:39:45 -0500 From: "jackthetab" Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) No, you are not totally wrong actually. I have to say that I am rather annoyed that Steve Roach is compared to everyone these days....as if he is the greatest "ambient" artist of all time. I further have to say that I am the one that brought this one up...and I probably should have just ignored it and let it go. Alas, vodka can make you do a lot of things you might not have done if sober..... I dont care if anyone likes Steve Roach, I am just annoyed by the fact that it seems like the name is everywhere these days. This is a FAX list, not the Steve Roach list. He has his own mailing list.....and I guess it should be left at that. I am sorry I went digging. I am waiting for a commercial on the tube with a Steve Roach track in the background (not that I would be able to tell that it is him). Call me annoying if you want. I just like to voice my opinions....dont forget, I work on mental health and at times, when I come home, I need to vent things. Frankly, I am surprised I am not a patient yet! kunst und wahnsinn, jackthetab #####\ _ /##### #( )# | _( )__ | #( )# ##### | /_woof/ | ##### #" "# | ___m/I_ /_____ | #" "# # O # |____#-x.\ /++m\ /.x-#____| # O # #m.m# | /" \ ///###\\\ / "\ | #m.m# #####/ ######/ \###### \##### /_______________________________________\ - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Philips" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:53 PM Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) > > Or maybe it's just JTT doesn't like Steve Roach and maybe he subscribed to > the FAX list so he could discuss FAX stuff and not Roach stuff and maybe > he finds it strange that Steve Roach is being discussed on the FAX list > and AFAIK he has no CDs on Fax. Neither does Vir Unis or Robert Rich for > that matter. Maybe JTT is just sick and tired of hearing about Steve > Roach, or maybe I'm totally wrong. > > > Stephen Philips > Dark Duck Records > e | music@darkduck.net > web | http://www.darkduck.net > Drone Download Project: http://www.darkduck.net/drone.htm > > > > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:44:44 -0500 From: "jackthetab" Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) We dont want to confuse the two lists really. In all honesty, I feel that this list is a little more mature, even when there are some immature moments. kunst und wahnsinn, jackthetab #####\ _ /##### #( )# | _( )__ | #( )# ##### | /_woof/ | ##### #" "# | ___m/I_ /_____ | #" "# # O # |____#-x.\ /++m\ /.x-#____| # O # #m.m# | /" \ ///###\\\ / "\ | #m.m# #####/ ######/ \###### \##### /_______________________________________\ - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Philips" To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:33 PM Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) > > Warren Lapham wrote: > > > Stephen, if you have (or anyone else has) a problem with threads that > > you percieve as off-topic, please mail me in private. I don't think > > anyone will argue with me when I observe that JTT himself could probably > > voice his own concerns, if he has any. > > > I don't perceive anything, I just keep to myself, read, and lurk ;-) I > think there's so little FAX stuff coming out these days that a little off > topic post every now and then is no big deal, or an extremely big deal, > depending on your own perception. > > On that note, I think the general JTT-bashing is about as irritating as > JTT bashing Roach so there. Either way I don't really care it's just that > I was starting to confuse the FAX list with the ambient mailing list there > for a second :-) > > > Stephen Philips > Dark Duck Records > e | music@darkduck.net > web | http://www.darkduck.net > Drone Download Project: http://www.darkduck.net/drone.htm > > > > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:52:13 -0500 From: "jackthetab" Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) - ----- Original Message ----- From: "ambient" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:12 PM Subject: RE: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) > it was jtt who started it. > and i REALLY REALLY wish he didn`t. > You just had to get your two cents in didnt you :-) kunst und wahnsinn, jackthetab #####\ _ /##### #( )# | _( )__ | #( )# ##### | /_woof/ | ##### #" "# | ___m/I_ /_____ | #" "# # O # |____#-x.\ /++m\ /.x-#____| # O # #m.m# | /" \ ///###\\\ / "\ | #m.m# #####/ ######/ \###### \##### /_______________________________________\ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:53:15 -0500 From: "jackthetab" Subject: Re: (fax) Faxlist Etiquette (???) (I hope this thread dies soon) Me too....no more posts from me on this one kunst und wahnsinn, jackthetab #####\ _ /##### #( )# | _( )__ | #( )# ##### | /_woof/ | ##### #" "# | ___m/I_ /_____ | #" "# # O # |____#-x.\ /++m\ /.x-#____| # O # #m.m# | /" \ ///###\\\ / "\ | #m.m# #####/ ######/ \###### \##### /_______________________________________\ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:11:27 +0000 From: Paul Milligan Subject: (fax) Orientation > From: "jackthetab" > I would like to spank Paul....but he is not interested. No, I like to be spanked. (But not shot in head) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:49:02 +0000 From: Paul Milligan Subject: (fax) Non-Fax artists being discussed here (and why not?) Warren wrote: > Or, alternately, you _could_ say that any review posted at 2350.org is > fair game to discuss on the list, so if that review compares a title to > the work of artists not related to the label (which is a common and > perfectly acceptable way to create a frame of reference), then it's OK > to bring up those artists on the list. A sentiment I would endorse whole-heartedly. Apart from the fact many of the members have a wider interest in electronic music in general, all Fax music is not universally unique in its character. I have personally discovered the music of several non-Fax artists through recommendations here; including Gas, Koner and yes... Robert Rich !!! Let's be honest, there's less directly Fax-related topics to talk about than there was say 3 years ago, when the release schedule started to slow right down and the Sub Label went into hypersleep. Specifically, on the subject of Steve Roach I don't ever recall seeing anyone here compare him to a Fax artist. Not being sufficiently familiar with his body of work I am unable to say for sure but, I suspect that Blood Machine bears the greater thumbprint of Vir Unis? Incidentally, I understand that Roach is big in the States, but not so here in the UK, or the rest of Europe come to that, where it is probably safe to say that he is no more or less important than a hundred other synth/ambient artists. I heard his Magnificent Void once, it wasn't bad, but for darker ambient I much prefer the likes of the original Outland release, although my favourite dark ambient track on Fax is the one on the 3rd Outland ... Keeper of the ?????? Flame or something similar. Brilliant. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:01:35 EST From: RLynn9@aol.com Subject: Re: (fax) Non-Fax artists being discussed here (and why not?) In a message dated 1/16/03 3:49:23 AM Central Standard Time, paulmilligan@georgiadesign.com writes: << I heard his Magnificent Void once, it wasn't bad, but for darker ambient I much prefer the likes of the original Outland release, although my favourite dark ambient track on Fax is the one on the 3rd Outland ... Keeper of the ?????? Flame or something similar. Brilliant. >> "Keeper of the Purple Twilight" which is also the name of an OUTER LIMITS episode from the 60's.... Robert ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:01:24 -0000 From: Richard Hughes Subject: (fax) Outlands >>Keeper of the ?????? - Purple Twilight. Yep, Outland 3 is defintely my favourite of the 4. The 1st one can't be beaten for the overall atmosphere it induces, whereas I felt the second one had its moments but lacked a certain direction. The same could be said of Volume 4 which whilst generally quite enjoyable tried a bit too hard with the whole 'East Meets West' concepts. The third on the other hand, whilst not particuarly melodic features some seriously good drum tracks and some great bass work by (I assume) Mr Laswell. *************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients, any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing client contract. **************************************************************************** ********************************************************************** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.eclipsecomputing.com ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:11:46 -0000 From: "Corbin, Nick (CAP, EEF)" Subject: RE: (fax) Outlands >> Yep, Outland 3 is defintely my favourite of the 4. The 1st one can't be beaten for the overall atmosphere it induces, whereas I felt the second one had its moments but lacked a certain direction. The same could be said of Volume 4 which whilst generally quite enjoyable tried a bit too hard with the whole 'East Meets West' concepts. The third on the other hand, whilst not particuarly melodic features some seriously good drum tracks and some great bass work by (I assume) Mr Laswell. << that's really interesting because i recently got 2 and 3 and didn't find them to be anywhere near as immediately engaging as 1. i was really keen to get the first installment and absolutely loved it; the whole disc is just dripping with 'atmosphere' as richard says, and imo a certain malevolence which keeps your attention. one of the best 'dark(er)' fax releases, along with '62 eulengasse'... This e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) named above only. As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information, if you are not the named addressee(s) or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee(s), please telephone us immediately. The contents of this e-mail should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:03:36 +0000 From: Paul Milligan Subject: (fax) the dark stuff > Volume 4 tried a bit too hard with the whole 'East Meets West' concept Yeah, that's what I felt. I revised my original 2350 review of Vol 4 some time later cause I quickly bored of it >.... one of the best 'dark(er)' fax releases, along with '62 eulengasse' Wow. I never really thought of 62e as a particularly dark one (ie. ominous) more a melancholic affair... I'll listen to it again tonight ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:17:26 -0000 From: "Corbin, Nick (CAP, EEF)" Subject: RE: (fax) the dark stuff >>.... one of the best 'dark(er)' fax releases, along with '62 eulengasse' >Wow. I never really thought of 62e as a particularly dark one (ie. ominous) more a melancholic affair... I'll listen to it again tonight perhaps it was me listening to it after i'd heard all of '2350', 'shades' and the other inoue/namlook collabs and expecting something a bit 'lighter'. to me it carries a slightly oppressive air, but definitely melancholic too; it's a disc where you need to be in the right mood to listen to it. This e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) named above only. As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information, if you are not the named addressee(s) or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee(s), please telephone us immediately. The contents of this e-mail should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:24:31 +0000 From: Paul Milligan Subject: (fax) 62 e >definitely melancholic too don't you think the picture on the f/c art perfectly captures the tone? One of the best ever audio/visual pairings on Fax. Others? ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:27:02 -0000 From: "Corbin, Nick (CAP, EEF)" Subject: (fax) RE: 62 e > don't you think the picture on the f/c art perfectly captures the tone? One of the best ever audio/visual pairings on Fax. *definitely*. it's strange you should mention that because i've looked at it before and thought that, without it really registering. to me it just says 'urban decay'. > Others? 2350 broadway 2 - reminds of a close-up of the surface of a spaceship in some far off galaxy. both the alien community releases. zenith for me i've always found 'electro harmonix' to be curious. never quite fathomed it... This e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) named above only. As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information, if you are not the named addressee(s) or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee(s), please telephone us immediately. The contents of this e-mail should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:30:48 EST From: RLynn9@aol.com Subject: Re: (fax) 62 e In a message dated 1/16/03 10:24:08 AM Central Standard Time, paulmilligan@georgiadesign.com writes: re: 62 Eulengasse- << don't you think the picture on the f/c art perfectly captures the tone? One of the best ever audio/visual pairings on Fax. Others? >> i have the cd but i'm not sure i remember the cover art...isn't a picture of Pete's neighborhood in the winter? actually, i am quite fond of the cover art for the AW re-issue of 2350 Broadway...i couldn't remember where i saw that image before, then it smacked me on the head as i was watched the latest restored version of Fritz Lang's classic:METROPOLIS...fits very well, imho.... Robert ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:33:39 -0000 From: "Corbin, Nick (CAP, EEF)" Subject: RE: (fax) 62 e > i have the cd but i'm not sure i remember the cover art...isn't a picture of Pete's neighborhood in the winter? er, perhaps he (or any other residents) might not appreciate my 'urban decay' comment then...! :) This e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) named above only. As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information, if you are not the named addressee(s) or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee(s), please telephone us immediately. The contents of this e-mail should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:36:45 EST From: RLynn9@aol.com Subject: Re: (fax) FAX COVER ART (formerly:RE: 62 e) I must be dunce! I STILL do not see the image on the cover of Atom Heart's SOFTCORE release....my father says he sees it but won't tell me what it is! he wants me to finally get it.....ARGH! Robert ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:43:48 +0000 From: Paul Milligan Subject: (fax) Re: 62 e >> don't you think the picture on the f/c art perfectly captures the tone? > One of the best ever audio/visual pairings on Fax. > > *definitely*. it's strange you should mention that because i've looked at > it before and thought that, without it really registering. to me it just > says 'urban decay'. yes but there's something else too ... isolationism maybe? It's one of the few Fax covers I find myself frequently staring at for more than just 10 seconds (whilst the music is playing) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:58:20 +1100 From: "Dan Rossi" Subject: RE: (fax) the dark stuff outland 4 has to be one of the most enchanting of the 4 , their use of effects and mixing are insane , and i luv the deep flute peices , 3 is more drum orientated and very big in its sound , sounds really good on a 2k sound system , gets the full pan action happening, i feel though 3 has no meaning, has babylon samples all the way through it which annoys me , 4 does have meaning to me , 62 is an epic journey :D - -----Original Message----- From: owner-faxlist@2350.org [mailto:owner-faxlist@2350.org]On Behalf Of Paul Milligan Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:04 AM To: faxlist@2350.org Subject: (fax) the dark stuff > Volume 4 tried a bit too hard with the whole 'East Meets West' concept Yeah, that's what I felt. I revised my original 2350 review of Vol 4 some time later cause I quickly bored of it >.... one of the best 'dark(er)' fax releases, along with '62 eulengasse' Wow. I never really thought of 62e as a particularly dark one (ie. ominous) more a melancholic affair... I'll listen to it again tonight - --- + To post: ; to mail a person: + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org ------------------------------ End of faxlist-digest V2003 #13 ******************************** --- + To post: ; to mail a person: + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to + Online info at: www.faxlabel.com www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org