From: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org (faxlist-digest) To: faxlist-digest@monkey.org Subject: faxlist-digest V2004 #3 Reply-To: faxlist@2350.org Sender: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org Errors-To: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org Precedence: bulk faxlist-digest Wednesday, January 7 2004 Volume 2004 : Number 003 Re: (fax) rereleases (fax) Octopus 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 21:54:13 +0000 From: Agust A J Subject: Re: (fax) rereleases actually, after I had that weird dsotm6 mixup, I took a look at the matrix numbers on some of the aw releases, and some of them have pk 08/xxx or ps/pw numbers as the old releases did (along with the same mm/yy month/year code), while some have aw xxx codes with mm/yy matching the re-release dates (I'm presuming). and that really has made me wonder... are those actual remasters, and if so, were they cleaned up too etc? or are they just straight dumps from backup dat tapes? maybe someone needs to ask pete to find out what's going on :) (I'm really curious why my dsotm6 aw029 had an extra cd labelled as dsotm6 containing pk 08/113 instead :) - --- Agust "nemesis1" - aaj@centrum.is - ICQ: 1290264 - http://nem1.cjb.net free your :) [tm] ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:03:10 EST From: RLynn9@aol.com Subject: (fax) Octopus 2 is it just me or does anyone else find that Octopus 2 is recorded at really low levels...i have my computer (albeit a crappy one) turned all the way up and it's still too low....listened to Dreamfish 2 and Air earlier and didn't have this problem... RL p.s. anybody know when the David Moufang cd "Pop For Dwoozle" comes out? ------------------------------ End of faxlist-digest V2004 #3 ****************************** --- + To post: ; to mail a person: + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to + Online info at: www.faxlabel.com www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org