From: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org (faxlist-digest) To: faxlist-digest@monkey.org Subject: faxlist-digest V2005 #7 Reply-To: faxlist@2350.org Sender: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org Errors-To: owner-faxlist-digest@2350.org Precedence: bulk faxlist-digest Saturday, February 5 2005 Volume 2005 : Number 007 Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork Re: (fax) next for fax Re: (fax) next for fax Re: (fax) next for fax Re[2]: (fax) next for fax Re: (fax) next for fax Re: Re[2]: (fax) next for fax (fax) Rock Pants Re: (fax) Rock Pants Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork RE: (fax) next for fax/cover art Re: (fax) next for fax (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ Re: (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ Re: (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ Re: (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ (fax) great... Re: (fax) great... Re: (fax) great... Re: (fax) great... Re: (fax) great... Re: (fax) great... (fax) FA: eBay Re: (fax) great... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:53:15 +0100 From: Alexander S.Kunz Subject: Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork Hello Paul Milligan & everyone else 01-Feb-2005 10:52, you wrote: >> Wasn't he maybe (just) "in the right place and the right time", or >> something like that? I mean... the time when KS began was the spring of >> electronic music, was it? > Yes... but only because he & a small handful of significant others > (chiefly from your neck of the woods) INSTIGATED that Spring. He didn't > jump on their gravy train...he stoked it up before it even left the > station! I don't know. I wasn't there. I'm not even 35 years old. :) But, if I'm allowed to draw a parallel to... the Beatles, or Elvis... where they the first to, erm, "rock?" No. They just were at the right place in the right time. Thats what I meant. They are *considered* to have been the first, the ones who formed their genre nowadays, however. Now, I don't want to scratch on the image of KS being an electronic artist with the most perseverance for "his thing". I just have the feeling that sometimes, KS is a wee bit over-glorified by his audience, like people going "w00t! dsotmX!" now. Forgive me, thats a bit like a mild version of screaming teens when the Backstreet Boys step out of the tour bus. ;-) A little bit indifference now and there isn't the worst idea, and for me, thats asking the question if another dsotm is really that essential, or if it maybe isn't a bit of taking a save position when it comes to "what to release next", Fax-wise. There is stuff in the Fax catalogue that was much riskier to release. > Ten good examples (in chronological order, over a 33 year period): Thanks for that list, your in-depth insight into KS' work is superior to mine, of course (but that was clear from the start, was it *g*). - -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Deliplayer2 is playing: "Leave Home" by The Chemical Brothers from the 1995 album 'Exit Planet Dust' ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:05:08 -0800 From: "Greg Hill" Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax I come to this conclusion from my original old school roots background of synths, funk(rap) and drum machines....bascially, I got into "synth" music from Electro Funk music in the mid 80s...I was so intrigued by the spacey string synths and Robot vocoder voice and 808 drum machines that I needed to find out if there were other styles of mainly instrumental synth music(this was acutally about 10 years later from 1986)...I found "techno" music in the mid 90s and I was really intrigued..then I found Autechre's, "IDM" styled "electro" (an element to there early stuff was the spacey strings, etc)...then I moved on, found out about Fax, etc, etc....bascially I like melody driven music that has some sort of werid sounding synths(usually the strings will always get me)....Bascially, what I'm saying is that the last DSOM does not have the ingredients that I LIKE in synth music...I just can't get into stuff without any sort of structure and doesn't seem to go anywhere(I dislike all the drone stuff, and do-nothing ambient without any sort of melody)... - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Milligan" To: Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:43 AM Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax > on 31/01/2005 4:04 am, Greg Hill at cameron69@comcast.net wrote: > > > I might be one of the few on the list but I didn't like DSOTM IX at > > all...now if it is like DSOTM V or VII now we are talking! > > > Wow, hard to contemplate how one could arrive at this view but, perfectly > entitled to state it of course. (Incidentally VI better than the two that > bookend it imo.) > > I for one will be interested to see if there is an element of PK > re-interpreting basic tracks laid down by KS which appear elsewhere on KS's > solo stuff. Thinking of what happened with DSOTM IX and Contemporary Works > not that I have a problem with it, treatments were sufficiently different. > KS has a new one in the can but release has been delayed because they want > to reissue some of his earlier ones first (on new label) with bonus trax. > Apparently 'X' has one track extended by 15 mins and another new one at c25 > mins... wow, can't wait. > > On the Psychnavigation 2 reissue can only guess that this has something to > do with Laswell fan base picking up sufficient copies to justify pressing? > It can't have anything to do with demand amongst Faxhead hardcore, surely? > > Paul > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:27:23 -0800 From: "Greg Hill" Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax EXACTLY! thank you Alexander! melody, chord structures are very boring in my opinion as well... - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander S.Kunz" To: Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:39 AM Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax > Hello Andre Ruello & everyone else > > 30-Jan-2005 12:03, you [AR] wrote: > > AR> dark side of the moog X > > Will it be more that the Schultze recycling of #9? I doubt it... > > Call me a heretic - I find the chord structures, melody riffs and solos > from KS are boring after a while. Not only in the "Moog" series, I mean. In > general. Maybe its "take it or leave it (and hate it)", I don't know. > > But then again, I surely have heard only very "few" KS discs regarding the > man's output ... but alas, it seems some people still don't have enough of > it. :-) > > All IMHO of course, and don't get me wrong, some of the Moog series have > their moments (#5 is surely my favorite), but it doesn't justify yet > *another* release... > > -- > Best regards, > Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) > > Allen's Distinction: The lion and the calf shall lie down together, > but the calf won't get much sleep. > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:35:37 -0800 From: "Greg Hill" Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax Paul, there are people on this list who consider most of his stuff repetitive..he is(Klaus) VERY overrated. If you don't like my opinion, then so be it. The releases of the DSOM series that are good(#5,7, and parts of 8) all have beats and interesting melodies, this is what makes the music good.. Why is it that most people think #5 is the best release? because its very melodic and interesting...unlike the drifting, go nowhere crap of #'s 1,3 and 9. Of course some people like these types of releases(You), but more I believe, like the beat oriented, more interesting releases. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Milligan" To: "Alexander S.Kunz" Cc: Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:16 AM Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax > on 31/01/2005 4:39 pm, Alexander S.Kunz at lx@neurowerx.de wrote: > > > I find the chord structures, melody riffs and solos from KS are boring > > after a while. Not only in the "Moog" series, I mean. In general. > > > > But then again, I surely have heard only very "few" KS discs regarding > > the man's output ... > > Feel obliged to jump to Klaus's defence, yeah I know I do it periodically > but, he has become something of a soft target on the list. > > For the record, yes, I accept he can 'noodle-on' a bit and there is clear > evidence of repetition but, I have been spinning all 5 of his Contemporary > Works 2 collection a lot lately and I have to say I am still getting off on > some of the subtle nuance and detail. > > For a lot of Schulze fans I think it's about getting into the Schulzendorf > groove' and, once you're locked-in, those 30 minute tracks can pass by in > seemingly half that time. > > The Moog series is not a good benchmark to judge, despite the fact there's > some great stuff in there. Anyway, here is my punchline:- > > KS now has a legacy of recorded music stretching back over 35 years. There > are **undoubtably** significant high points in **every** decade that his > music has spanned. I know of no other electronic/synth/ambient artist for > whom a comparable claim could even begin to be made. > > I rest my case. > > Paul > > > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:52:12 -0500 From: micah stupak Subject: Re[2]: (fax) next for fax on Tuesday, February 1, 2005, Greg Hill wrote... > Paul, there are people on this list who consider most of his stuff > repetitive..he is(Klaus) VERY overrated. If you don't like my > opinion, then so be it. The releases of the DSOM series that are > good(#5,7, and parts of 8) all have beats and interesting melodies, > this is what makes the music good.. Why is it that most people think > #5 is the best release? because its very melodic and > interesting...unlike the drifting, go nowhere crap of #'s 1,3 and 9. > Of course some people like these types of releases(You), but more I > believe, like the beat oriented, more interesting releases. hey, i like 4 and 6 best, where does that leave me? :P fyi, why are you on a list devoted to ambient music espousing the idea that "beats = good music; no beats = bad music"? - --- micah stupak micah@benthic.cc www.benthic.cc benthic recordings - soundings from unexplored places ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:04:00 -0800 From: "Greg Hill" Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax opps....meant to say I LIKE melody and chord strutures. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Hill" To: "Alexander S.Kunz" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:27 PM Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax > EXACTLY! thank you Alexander! melody, chord structures are very boring in my > opinion as well... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander S.Kunz" > To: > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:39 AM > Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax > > > > Hello Andre Ruello & everyone else > > > > 30-Jan-2005 12:03, you [AR] wrote: > > > > AR> dark side of the moog X > > > > Will it be more that the Schultze recycling of #9? I doubt it... > > > > Call me a heretic - I find the chord structures, melody riffs and solos > > from KS are boring after a while. Not only in the "Moog" series, I mean. > In > > general. Maybe its "take it or leave it (and hate it)", I don't know. > > > > But then again, I surely have heard only very "few" KS discs regarding the > > man's output ... but alas, it seems some people still don't have enough of > > it. :-) > > > > All IMHO of course, and don't get me wrong, some of the Moog series have > > their moments (#5 is surely my favorite), but it doesn't justify yet > > *another* release... > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) > > > > Allen's Distinction: The lion and the calf shall lie down together, > > but the calf won't get much sleep. > > > > --- > > + To post: ; to mail a person: > > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > > > > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:08:47 -0800 From: "Greg Hill" Subject: Re: Re[2]: (fax) next for fax good point! which I'm sure other's on here are wondering....basically, I DO like some ambient music...Harold Budd/Eno stuff, Jason Sloan, Patrick O Hearn, some of the older Spotted Peccary, etc, etc...... like I said in prior messages, I just don't like the droney, drifting spacey type of Ambient(without melody). That's all. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "micah stupak" To: "faxfolk" Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:52 PM Subject: Re[2]: (fax) next for fax > on Tuesday, February 1, 2005, Greg Hill wrote... > > > Paul, there are people on this list who consider most of his stuff > > repetitive..he is(Klaus) VERY overrated. If you don't like my > > opinion, then so be it. The releases of the DSOM series that are > > good(#5,7, and parts of 8) all have beats and interesting melodies, > > this is what makes the music good.. Why is it that most people think > > #5 is the best release? because its very melodic and > > interesting...unlike the drifting, go nowhere crap of #'s 1,3 and 9. > > Of course some people like these types of releases(You), but more I > > believe, like the beat oriented, more interesting releases. > > hey, i like 4 and 6 best, where does that leave me? :P > > fyi, why are you on a list devoted to ambient music espousing the idea > that "beats = good music; no beats = bad music"? > > --- > micah stupak > micah@benthic.cc > www.benthic.cc > benthic recordings - soundings from unexplored places > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:59:54 +0000 From: Paul Milligan Subject: (fax) Rock Pants > why are you on a list devoted to ambient music espousing the idea > that "beats = good music; no beats = bad music"? I must concur with the above. The recent discussion on KS has prompted some over-simplification of 'styles'. Like PK, KS has albums that are beat-orientated; not overtly beat-orientated but rhythmic nevertheless; & neither beat nor rhythmically orientated, go figure. If I was to post here saying that I preferred Fax releases which only fell into one of these categories it would be embarrassing. Examples (could quote dozens more)... I love Ambient Otaku and Shades Of Orion 2 but, also love Wechelspannung and A Day In The Live. Is this permitted? Incidentally, how many here have heard an album by Stomu Yamashta's Go (recorded live in Paris on 16.06.76) never officially available on CD? which Island put out on vinyl. It's a fantastic blend of musical styles featuring a dozen well known artists of the time. However, the most significant contributions arguably come from Michael Shrieve and a certain KS, who lent a 'spaciness' to the proceedings. When Stomu introduces the band KS gets more applause than all the rest, who include luminaries like Steve Winwood & Al De Miola! Of course KS and MS later went on to produce Transfer Station Blue, a heady fusion of synth and latin rhythm that really rocks its pants off! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:50:04 -0600 (CST) From: Trevor Cordes Subject: Re: (fax) Rock Pants On 2 Feb, Paul Milligan wrote: > > If I was to post here saying that I preferred Fax releases which only > fell into one of these categories it would be embarrassing. Examples > (could quote dozens more)... I love Ambient Otaku and Shades Of Orion 2 > but, also love Wechelspannung and A Day In The Live. Is this permitted? Sure! I'm sure most people here will have favorites amongst both beat and beatless FAX releases (and the Jazz, and the ...). ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:02:20 -0600 (CST) From: Trevor Cordes Subject: Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork On 1 Feb, Alexander S.Kunz wrote: > sometimes, KS is a wee bit over-glorified by his audience, like people > going "w00t! dsotmX!" now. Forgive me, thats a bit like a mild version of > screaming teens when the Backstreet Boys step out of the tour bus. ;-) Don't forget that PK has stated that the DSotM series is by far his best selling series. A big money-maker to help bankroll the more obscure FAX releases. So even if you don't like it, don't try to discourage its continuance! Personally, I like nearly the entire DSotM series from 3 on. 1 and 2 are a bit too ambient/spacey/drifting for me, though I haven't given them too much play time so my opinion is subject to updates! 9 is the pinnacle not for KS's contribution, but for PK's amazing production abilities and his stellar rhythm & structure around KS's wanderings. This disc simply sounds like best produced FAX album ever in terms of sound quality. Listen to it on a high quality stereo and compare with, say, Xangadix or Air 1 ;-) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:18:53 +0100 (CET) From: Leszek Zabinski Subject: Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork > This disc simply sounds like best produced FAX album ever in terms of > sound quality. Listen to it on a high quality stereo and compare with, > say, Xangadix or Air 1 ;-) that depends on what do you reckon as "high quality stereo"... as for myself, in terms of production and overall sound realisation i will always praise both S.H.A.D.O parts (with the second one being a little bit superior). greets, Leszek. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:08:24 -0800 From: "Greg Hill" Subject: Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork to me the S.H.A.D.O releases were close to being the best in the fax catelogue(I would say top 5 for me). - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leszek Zabinski" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:18 AM Subject: Re: (fax) Schulze / Fax artwork > > > This disc simply sounds like best produced FAX album ever in terms of > > sound quality. Listen to it on a high quality stereo and compare with, > > say, Xangadix or Air 1 ;-) > > that depends on what do you reckon as "high quality stereo"... > > as for myself, in terms of production and overall sound realisation i will > always praise both S.H.A.D.O parts (with the second one being a little bit > superior). > > > > greets, > > Leszek. > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:24:01 +0100 From: "Ilmar Links" Subject: RE: (fax) next for fax/cover art For what it's worth. In some ways you're right. Just think for example about Hemisphere the old edition with the back of a statue (amazing!) with the blue circle and that globe. Watching to that cover you'll get a whole different feeling than if you look at the Ambient World release which has got some with vivid colours, mechanic computer animated heads or something and symmetric as usual. The old covers always are simple and the same with the exception of the picture in the middle-circle which changes each time, but you'll get some very fine feelings and inspiration watching to that picture while listening. ilmar2350 >From: "joey@etherworld.com" >Reply-To: joey@etherworld.com >To: faxlist@2350.org >Subject: (fax) next for fax/cover art >Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:28:49 -0500 > >Just saw the cover art for Psychonavigation II to be re-issued on AW and >I'm sorry to say but I really >do NOT like the newer look for Fax releases. Yes, this happened a few years >ago but I've been silent >for too long! > >Please know this in no way means that I'm trying to publically disrespect >the artist, whom i think >may be Andre (if I'm not mistaken). I'm not questioning his talents or >personal style and tastes, just >the covers. This leads me to a question: Are these covers based on art >direction from Pete or are >they created without his input? > >Perhaps it's just a case of personal taste but the newer looking covers >with the amoeba-like space >backdrops or the colorful yet mechanical-looking textures really turn me >off to buying these newer >releases. Yes, I know, it's the music I should be worried about but the >older FAX releases inspire me >in many ways. They were unique in the way FAX could only accomplish and I >miss that. > >I miss the older covers circa '94-'95. Can FAX do a "tribute" cover on >their next release so >FAXHEADS that enjoy those covers can stop whining? ;-) > >Regards, > >Joe > > > > >Original Message: >----------------- >From: Jason riouxs@aol.com >Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:38:03 -0500 >To: andre@sansserifgrafik.com, faxlist@2350.org >Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax > > > > > > > next for fax. > > > > dark side of the moog X > > > > + Psychonavigation 2 reissue on Ambient World > >A strange choice for a reissue. Doesn't everybody have 2 copies of >this? C'mon already, where is Datacide II? > >Jason > >-- >Infraction Records >infractionrecords.com > >Outnow: > >Koda - Movements CD (INFX 008) "Stars of the Lid multi-layered drone for >the backdrop of winter" > >Andrew Liles - New York Doll 2CD (INFX 013) >"Two continents, a dozen hidden meanings, the input of a hundred people >and a thousand hours >compiled tape - beautifully compressed onto two discs." > >Beequeen - Music for the Head Ballet CD (INFX 009) > >Outsoon: > >Zimiamvian Night - s/t CD (INFX 007) >Cavernous drones recalling Zoviet France and distant scenes created nearing >the likes of Mirror. Limited edition of 50 numbered copies. > >Ultra Milkmaids & Aidan Baker - At home with... CD (INFX 010) > > >--- >+ To post: ; to mail a person: >+ To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to >+ Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >mail2web - Check your email from the web at >http://mail2web.com/ . > > >--- >+ To post: ; to mail a person: >+ To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to >+ Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org _________________________________________________________________ MSN Webmessenger overal en altijd beschikbaar http://webmessenger.msn.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:06:56 +0100 From: "Ilmar Links" Subject: Re: (fax) next for fax I think dsotm 3 is great just like all the dsotm releases. I think it's a little bit dumb to compare that releases with each other. You have to listen to each album on its own. I guess dsotm 3 is hard to understand cause it isn't recognizable. The album starts with two long drifting ambient tracks, very hard to get in the sphere namlook and schulze are creating. Not everyone can understand the beauty of the piece, it's very complex. I recommend to listen to that kind of albums a lot of times. That albums "which lead to nowhere' such an anoying notice with all respect, please do not interpret this wrong. ilmar2350 _________________________________________________________________ Gebruik MSN Webmessenger op je werk en op school http://webmessenger.msn.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:38:57 -0500 From: micah stupak Subject: (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ boy, this is a weird one. kind of. some of the trance tracks on disc one are pretty good ("escape to earth") and some are downright awful ("escape to mars"). and the ambient tracks on disc one are real yawners. disc two is pretty excellent, though (well, so far, only in part 2). love the piano motif in the first two tracks. samples of kids talking about space always sound really creepy. - --- micah stupak micah@benthic.cc www.benthic.cc benthic recordings - soundings from unexplored places ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:09:19 -0800 From: Christian von Ompteda Subject: Re: (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ I just got this one recently, and have to agree, the second disk is about the only thing that saves the release. It really runs the gamut from environmental/drone (and yes, I also loved the creepy kid samples and piano as well) to some beat-oriented (though nevertheless still very much in character) action later in the piece. All in all, this is a great one to listen to on a dark, cloudy afternoon or a spooky night. Given how 'dated' some of the earlier PK trance releases sound (and many of the escape to/from tracks on disc 1 do fall into this category), this second disc is a refreshingly timeless piece. Get it just for this - after all, you've probably heard most of the disc one tracks via the various Fax comps and 12"s (including a few Rising High reissues) if you're a completist. Also have to say that in comparison, the skew between these isn't as bad with Syn, whose discs one and two are both pretty middle of the road IMHO. Quoting micah stupak : > boy, this is a weird one. kind of. some of the trance tracks on disc > one are pretty good ("escape to earth") and some are downright awful > ("escape to mars"). and the ambient tracks on disc one are real > yawners. disc two is pretty excellent, though (well, so far, only in > part 2). love the piano motif in the first two tracks. samples of kids > talking about space always sound really creepy. > > --- > micah stupak > micah@benthic.cc > www.benthic.cc > benthic recordings - soundings from unexplored places > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:15:51 -0800 From: Subject: Re: (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ I think the cristicism of CD1 of Escape is a bit harsh. CD1 has some nice melodies and atmosphere on many of the tracks. The three Mars tracks are my least favorite but I enjoy most of the disc. Escape to Mars is the only one I hit the skip button on. I agree that CD2 is very nice. Overall a solid release. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:37:40 -0800 From: "Greg Hill" Subject: Re: (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ can you still pick up this release on the net?? download on Emusic or Apple store? - ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "faxfolk" Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 8:15 AM Subject: Re: (fax) namlook + atmo _escape_ > I think the cristicism of CD1 of Escape is a bit harsh. CD1 has some nice > melodies and atmosphere on many of the tracks. The three Mars tracks are my > least favorite but I enjoy most of the disc. Escape to Mars is the only one > I hit the skip button on. I agree that CD2 is very nice. Overall a solid > release. > > > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:43:36 -0600 From: Trevor Cordes Subject: (fax) great... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4072829035 Just what we needed... some guy naming himself "FAX" and starting a label called "FAXMUSIK" that has nothing to do with our beloved label... The confusion begins! ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:51:41 -0700 From: David Hodgson Subject: Re: (fax) great... At 19:43 04/02/2005 -0600, Trevor Cordes wrote: >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4072829035 > >Just what we needed... some guy naming himself "FAX" and starting a label >called "FAXMUSIK" that has nothing to do with our beloved label... > >The confusion begins! actually it's a Mexican artist on the label ...very cool electronic music & recommended. david / pbe ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 20:58:43 -0500 From: theREALmxyzptlk Subject: Re: (fax) great... Trevor Cordes wrote: >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4072829035 > >Just what we needed... some guy naming himself "FAX" and starting a label >called "FAXMUSIK" that has nothing to do with our beloved label... > >The confusion begins! > > Fax has been around for a while and I don't think too many people have mistaken his output for the Namlook ilk - and he's pretty darned good (different style, though). The seller has this categorized as "alternative rock" which is a mystery - unless he cut/pasted the description from somewhere else (which is much more accurate). Think: "Nortec Collective", and Static Discos and you'll have an idea. Murcof comes from the general category. Great stuff imo and I have plenty of room on my shelves for more Faxes. jeff ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 21:27:07 -0500 From: "jackthetab" Subject: Re: (fax) great... actually, fax was used for a music artist or label, i forget which now...long before namlook. kunst und wahnsinn, jackthetab #####\ _ /##### #( )# | _( )__ | #( )# ##### | /_woof/ | ##### #" "# | ___m/I_ /_____ | #" "# # O # |____#-x.\ /++m\ /.x-#____| # O # #m.m# | /" \ ///###\\\ / "\ | #m.m# #####/ ######/ \###### \##### /_______________________________________\ die Intensität eines Automobilunfalles, ist einfach erstaunlich. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trevor Cordes" To: "Fax List" Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:43 PM Subject: (fax) great... > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4072829035 > > Just what we needed... some guy naming himself "FAX" and starting a label > called "FAXMUSIK" that has nothing to do with our beloved label... > > The confusion begins! > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 22:37:40 -0500 From: Alan Lucas Subject: Re: (fax) great... Record label. "Adult" records. Frequently featuring topless women on the covers. From the 50's/60's, I believe. On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 21:27:07 -0500, jackthetab wrote: > actually, fax was used for a music artist or label, i forget which > now...long before namlook. >=20 > kunst und wahnsinn, > jackthetab >=20 > #####\ _ /##### > #( )# | _( )__ | #( )# > ##### | /_woof/ | ##### > #" "# | ___m/I_ /_____ | #" "# > # O # |____#-x.\ /++m\ /.x-#____| # O # > #m.m# | /" \ ///###\\\ / "\ | #m.m# > #####/ ######/ \###### \##### > /_______________________________________\ > die Intensit=E4t eines Automobilunfalles, > ist einfach erstaunlich. >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Trevor Cordes" > To: "Fax List" > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:43 PM > Subject: (fax) great... >=20 > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3D4072829035 > > > > Just what we needed... some guy naming himself "FAX" and starting a lab= el > > called "FAXMUSIK" that has nothing to do with our beloved label... > > > > The confusion begins! > > --- > > + To post: ; to mail a person: > > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > > >=20 > --- > + To post: ; to mail a person: > + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to > + Online info at: www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 22:49:12 -0500 From: "jackthetab" Subject: Re: (fax) great... >Record label. "Adult" records. Frequently featuring >topless women on >the covers. From the 50's/60's, I believe. some how this rings a bell. its been a few years since i had seen those on the web, and on ebay. kunst und wahnsinn, jackthetab #####\ _ /##### #( )# | _( )__ | #( )# ##### | /_woof/ | ##### #" "# | ___m/I_ /_____ | #" "# # O # |____#-x.\ /++m\ /.x-#____| # O # #m.m# | /" \ ///###\\\ / "\ | #m.m# #####/ ######/ \###### \##### /_______________________________________\ die Intensität eines Automobilunfalles, ist einfach erstaunlich. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:39:10 -0500 From: Organicnavel@aol.com Subject: (fax) FA: eBay Hello, Recently listed for auction on eBay the following Fax label favorites: PS 08/58 AERIAL SERVICE AREA PS 08/59 XJACKS PS 08/64 UVOII The Sound of Heaven PS 08/98 THE PUTNEY II PK 08/148 NAMLOOK XV "Free Your Mind" PW 24 PSYCHONAVIGATION 2 [Sealed!] Plus a rare related classic from Tetsu Inoue and other electronic music classics! Check them out here: http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZorganicnavel or http://tinyurl.com/43hq6 Thanks for taking a look! Mark [organicnavel] ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:04:55 -0600 (CST) From: Trevor Cordes Subject: Re: (fax) great... On 4 Feb, theREALmxyzptlk wrote: > > Fax has been around for a while and I don't think too many people have > mistaken his output for the Namlook ilk - and he's pretty darned good > (different style, though). The seller has this categorized as > "alternative rock" which is a mystery - unless he cut/pasted the So the label listed as "FAXMUSIK" in the ebay listing is incorrect? OK, an artist named FAX I can handle... it's the label thing that miffed me. And I knew about the other "Adult" label FAX, but we can safely assume that wouldn't cause as much confusion as another electronica label named FAX! ... I'm mainly thinking in terms of searching on ebay in category CD's for "FAX" and hopefully just getting Namlook-relevant stuff. ------------------------------ End of faxlist-digest V2005 #7 ****************************** --- + To post: ; to mail a person: + To unsubscribe: "unsubscribe" to + Online info at: www.faxlabel.com www.hyperreal.org/fax www.2350.org